Scale reviewer-grade feedback across your whole research group

Every manuscript in your lab routes through you, and most of your edits are the same mechanical fixes. Fukurō gives each mentee a consistent, reviewer-grade read on structure, methodology, clarity, and citations, so your time goes to scientific judgment instead of comma-level cleanup.

Review a paper →Institutional plans
Consistent baseline · 32 review dimensions · Institutional pricing for labs

You are the bottleneck in your group's output

  1. 01

    Every draft waits in your inbox

    Six mentees, one of you. Manuscripts stack up waiting for the read only you can give, and the revise-and-resubmit clock keeps running the whole time they wait.

  2. 02

    You're editing structure, not science

    Half your comments are the same mechanical notes: unclear methods, a buried argument, missing citations. That is time you would rather spend on the ideas, not the plumbing.

  3. 03

    An uneven baseline reflects on the lab

    A weak submission burns a reviewer's goodwill and your group's reputation. Without a shared standard, quality swings with whoever happened to write the draft.

Raise the floor before it reaches your desk

Fukurō gives every member a reviewer-grade baseline read, so the drafts you see already clear the mechanical bar and your mentorship targets substance.

  • A consistent standard for everyone
    Every mentee gets the same reviewer-grade check on structure, methodology, clarity, and citations, before the draft reaches you.
  • Your time on judgment, not cleanup
    Basic clarity and structural issues are resolved up front, so your edits target the science and the strategy.
  • Faster revise-and-resubmit
    Rebuttal support maps each reviewer comment to a specific change, so responses are precise and revisions move quickly.
  • Version comparison across drafts
    See exactly what changed between revisions and confirm every reviewer request was actually addressed.
  • Feedback that scales with the group
    Every member reviews their own drafts on demand, so no single reviewer becomes the throughput limit.
  • Student manuscripts stay private
    Manuscripts are not used for AI training, extracted content is deleted shortly after review, and usage is not shared.

Institutional plans for labs and departments

For teams, institutional pricing unlocks higher volume so every member can review freely. Talk to us about plans for your lab or department.

Frequently asked questions

How does Fukurō help a research group?

It gives every mentee a consistent, reviewer-grade baseline read on their manuscripts, so your time with each student focuses on substance rather than basic clarity and structure fixes.

Can I use it across my group's papers?

Yes. Each member can run reviews on their own drafts. Institutional plans support teams and departments with higher volume.

Is student manuscript data private?

Yes. Manuscripts are not used for AI training and extracted content is deleted shortly after review. Usage is not shared.

Does it replace my feedback?

No. Fukurō handles the mechanical, reviewer-style checks (structure, clarity, citations) so your mentorship can focus on scientific judgment and strategy.

Give your group a reviewer before the reviewer

Raise the baseline on every manuscript and get your time back for the science.

Analyze my paper →See pricing
$2.99 · per review