Can you submit a paper that is already on arXiv?

You upload a manuscript to arXiv. A few weeks later, you find a journal or conference that looks like the right place for the work.

Can you still submit it?

In many cases, yes. Posting a manuscript on arXiv does not automatically prevent you from submitting the same work to a journal or conference. Nature Portfolio, Elsevier, and IEEE generally allow preprints under their current policies, although individual venues may have extra conditions.

The exact rule still depends on the journal, conference, or track you are submitting to. Some venues require you to disclose the preprint. Others limit public manuscript updates during anonymous review or after acceptance.

So the short answer is:

Yes, often. Check the exact venue before you submit.

First, what does posting on arXiv mean?

A manuscript on arXiv is generally a preprint: a public version of a research manuscript that has not yet completed the formal peer-review and publication process of a journal or conference.

Nature Portfolio defines a preprint as an author’s version of a research manuscript posted on a public server before formal journal peer review. Its policy allows authors to post preprints during peer review and states that doing so does not count as prior publication.

Elsevier makes a similar distinction. It defines a preprint as the author’s version before peer review and publisher editing, and its general policy allows authors to share that version publicly.

IEEE is especially clear for authors in engineering and computer science. Its Author Center states that authors planning to submit to IEEE may post preprints on arXiv, TechRxiv, approved nonprofit preprint servers, institutional repositories, or personal websites. IEEE does not consider this prior publication.

An arXiv preprint and a peer-reviewed article are therefore different stages of publication.

Posting on arXiv is not the same as submitting to two journals

Posting a preprint and submitting the same manuscript to two journals are different situations.

When you post a manuscript on arXiv, you make the work publicly available. You are not asking another journal to review it.

Submitting the same manuscript to two journals at the same time is different. ICMJE guidance states that authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time because both journals could unknowingly spend time reviewing and editing the same work.

ICMJE treats preprints separately. It recommends that authors tell the journal when submitted work has appeared on a preprint server and provide a link to that version.

In practice:

arXiv + one journal submission is often allowed.

Two journal submissions at the same time are generally not allowed.

Conference policies can follow the same pattern. RecSys 2026, for example, permits preprints under its stated conditions while separately prohibiting dual submission.

The journal’s policy still comes first

A publisher may allow preprints while an individual journal has extra conditions.

Elsevier, for example, generally allows authors to share preprints, but it notes that some society-owned journals and journals using double-anonymized review may follow different rules. Authors are directed to the journal’s own Guide for Authors.

ICMJE also recommends checking the policy of the target journal because journals do not all handle preprints in the same way.

Check the publisher’s general policy first, then verify the rules of the exact venue.

Before submitting, search the journal’s author instructions for terms such as:

• preprint;
• arXiv;
• prior publication;
• self-archiving;
• anonymous review;
• duplicate submission.

If the policy is still unclear, contact the editorial office before submitting.

What do major publishers say?

Major publishers generally allow preprints, but their policies also show why journal-specific rules still matter.

Nature Portfolio

Nature Portfolio supports preprints for primary research manuscripts. Its policy states that authors may post preprints during peer review and that posting a preprint does not count as prior publication.

An existing arXiv version therefore does not automatically prevent submission to a Nature Portfolio journal.

Elsevier

Elsevier’s general sharing policy allows authors to share preprints publicly.

If the article is later accepted, Elsevier encourages authors to link the preprint to the published article through the article DOI.

Some society-owned journals and journals using double-anonymized review may follow different rules, so authors still need to check the policy of the exact journal.

IEEE

IEEE allows authors to post preprints on arXiv and other approved locations before or during submission and states that this is not prior publication.

After acceptance, different rules apply. IEEE requires authors to update the posted version under its policy, including the final citation and DOI or the appropriate notice on the accepted version.

IEEE therefore separates preprint rules from the rules that apply after acceptance.

Conferences require extra care

In computer science, conference policies matter just as much as journal policies.

Even conferences under the same organization can use different preprint rules.

SPAA 2026, for example, uses a lightweight double-blind process and explicitly allows authors to continue sharing their work, including on arXiv. Reviewers are instructed not to search for author identities.

SIGMOD 2027 follows a different approach. Authors do not need to remove an existing arXiv version before submission, but they are asked not to upload or promote versions of the submitted manuscript during review because doing so could weaken double anonymity.

RecSys 2026 uses more detailed rules. An anonymous version of the submission may be posted on arXiv, while a non-anonymous version with substantial overlap may require disclosure and can be restricted during the review period.

So “ACM allows arXiv” is too broad to be useful.

A conference may change its preprint rules from one year or track to another.

What if the venue uses double-blind or double-anonymous review?

An arXiv preprint can reveal the authors’ names even when the submitted manuscript is anonymized.

An existing arXiv preprint does not automatically make the submission ineligible for anonymous review, but the venue may have specific restrictions.

Some conferences allow public preprints and instruct reviewers not to search for the authors. SPAA 2026 follows this approach.

Other venues limit public updates during review. SIGMOD 2027 allows an existing preprint to remain online but asks authors not to upload or publicize new manuscript versions during the review period.

RecSys 2026 distinguishes between anonymous and non-anonymous preprints and requires disclosure in some cases.

Instead of asking only whether your paper is already on arXiv, ask:

What does this venue allow authors to do with preprints before and during review?

Read the current call for papers or author instructions rather than relying on rules from a previous year.

Do you need to tell the journal about the arXiv version?

In many cases, yes.

ICMJE recommends that authors tell the journal if the submitted work has been posted on a preprint server and provide a link to it. This applies whether the preprint was posted before journal submission or during peer review.

Disclosure simply tells the editor that a public version already exists and where to find it.

If the venue asks for disclosure, you can usually provide a short note stating that an earlier version of the manuscript is available on arXiv, followed by the arXiv identifier or link.

Do not assume that the journal will find the preprint on its own.

Do you need to cite your own arXiv preprint?

There is no universal rule that every manuscript must cite its own arXiv version.

Some venues allow the preprint to appear in the reference list. Others handle disclosure through the submission system or cover letter. Anonymous-review rules can also affect how earlier versions should be mentioned.

ICMJE states that when preprints are cited, the reference should clearly identify them as preprints. If a peer-reviewed version later becomes available, the published version should generally be cited instead when appropriate.

Follow the target venue’s instructions on whether the arXiv version should be cited, disclosed separately, or both.

Can the journal submission be different from the arXiv version?

Yes.

The journal or conference submission can differ from the arXiv version. Authors may correct errors, improve explanations, add experiments, revise figures, strengthen the analysis, or change the title before submission.

If the venue uses anonymous review or limits public updates during review, check those rules before posting a new arXiv version.

After acceptance, it helps to distinguish three versions of the paper:

Preprint The author’s manuscript before formal peer review.

Accepted manuscript The version accepted after peer review, including revisions made during the review process but before the publisher’s final formatting.

Published article The final version released by the publisher.

Elsevier clearly distinguishes these versions in its sharing policy.

The sharing rules may differ for each version, especially after acceptance.

What happens to the arXiv version after publication?

In many cases, the arXiv version can stay online after publication.

Publishers often ask authors to link the preprint to the final article rather than remove it.

Elsevier encourages authors to link the preprint to the published article through its DOI.

ICMJE similarly recommends that authors make it possible for readers of the preprint to find later versions of the work, including the final peer-reviewed article.

IEEE has more specific requirements. After acceptance, authors must update the posted preprint with the IEEE citation and DOI or replace it with the accepted version carrying the required notice.

Do not assume that you can upload the publisher’s final PDF to arXiv simply because the original preprint was allowed.

The version you may share and the notice you must include can change after acceptance.

Can you keep updating arXiv during peer review?

That depends on the venue.

Nature Portfolio permits preprints to be posted during peer review under its general policy.

ICMJE is more cautious in the biomedical context. It advises authors not to post temporary versions that include revisions made in response to journal feedback during peer review.

Conference rules may be stricter. SIGMOD 2027 asks authors not to upload or publicize manuscript versions during review, while RecSys 2026 restricts some non-anonymous preprints during the review period.

A venue may allow an existing preprint to remain online while still limiting new arXiv versions during review.

Check the current policy before updating the preprint.

Does the arXiv license matter?

Yes, especially after acceptance.

The license selected for an arXiv preprint affects how that version may be reused. Publisher policies may also specify which version of the manuscript may remain public and what notice or license must appear with it after acceptance.

Before replacing or uploading a new version, check:

• the license selected for the arXiv version;
• the journal’s self-archiving policy;
• the publishing agreement after acceptance;
• any required copyright notice.

These rules become especially important after acceptance, when you may want to update or replace the arXiv version.

What should you check before submitting an arXiv paper?

If your manuscript is already on arXiv, do not remove it before checking the venue’s policy.

Check the requirements in this order:

1. Open the exact journal or conference instructions. Do not rely only on the publisher’s general policy.

2. Search for “preprint,” “arXiv,” and “prior publication.” Confirm that an existing preprint is allowed.

3. Check the anonymous-review rules. If the venue uses double-blind or double-anonymous review, look for specific restrictions on public preprints.

4. Check whether disclosure is required. The venue may ask for the arXiv identifier in the submission system, cover letter, manuscript, or another field.

5. Check whether you may post updates during review. An existing preprint may be allowed even when new public versions are restricted.

6. Check what happens after acceptance. Find out whether you may keep the original preprint, replace it with the accepted manuscript, or need to add a copyright notice and DOI.

7. Update the preprint after publication when required or permitted. Add the final article information so readers can find the peer-reviewed version.

A simple decision process

If your paper is already on arXiv, start with one question:

Does the exact journal or conference allow existing preprints?

If yes, check its disclosure, anonymous-review, update, and post-acceptance rules before submitting.

If the policy is unclear, contact the journal editor or conference chairs.

If the venue does not allow existing preprints, do not assume that removing the arXiv version will make the manuscript eligible. The manuscript has already been made public, and the venue may still consider that posting relevant to its prior-publication or anonymity policy.

Confirm the policy before submitting, not after the editor or program chair asks about the preprint.

Common mistakes

Many mistakes come from treating preprints, duplicate submissions, and published versions as if they followed the same rules.

One is assuming that posting on arXiv automatically counts as formal prior publication. Major publishers such as Nature Portfolio and IEEE clearly separate preprints from prior publication under their general policies.

Another is assuming that a publisher-wide policy applies without exception to every journal. Elsevier notes that some titles may follow different preprint rules.

A third is confusing a preprint with submitting the same manuscript to two journals at the same time. These are different situations, and simultaneous submission remains prohibited by many publication policies.

Other common mistakes include:

• ignoring anonymous-review rules;
• failing to disclose the preprint when required;
• posting new versions during a restricted review period;
• uploading a publisher-formatted PDF without checking the sharing rights.

Checking the venue’s policy before submission helps avoid these mistakes.

References and useful policies

1. Nature Portfolio. Preprints and conference proceedings.
2. Elsevier. Article sharing.
3. IEEE Author Center. Post-publication policies.
4. IEEE Author Center. Post your paper.
5. ICMJE. Overlapping publications.
6. RecSys 2026. Call for contributions.
7. ACM SPAA. Submission guidelines.
8. ACM SIGMOD 2027. Call for papers: SIGMOD research.
9. arXiv. License information.
10. Elsevier. Article sharing policy FAQ.